IPlanetary systems
Experimental engineering proposal

Earth-Data-Ring

Grow the network. Connect the ring.

Solar-electric sailplanes carrying AI computing, communications and power transfer: begin with microwave links, grow into a flexible superconducting ring, then deliver surplus electricity to the ground.

I / Experimental engineering proposal

Sunlight shared around Earth.

Independent solar aircraft become connected segments, then a continuous flexible power ring. Aircraft fly at efficient sailplane-like speeds; they do not need to chase the Sun. Altitude, true airspeed, route and spacing remain design variables.

The final architecture transfers electricity from the illuminated sector to the entire network. Retained microwave equipment can supply designated ground stations and bridge maintenance gaps.

Completed power ring across illuminated and dark sectors; schematic, not to scaleDAYNIGHTEarthSolar sector supplies both directionsTwo conductors form complete local and network circuits
Schematic geometry · not to scale · intended architecture, not a demonstrated system

Paired superconducting powerMicrowave powerData / control

Evidence boundary · initial study · 3 October 2026

Components exist. The integrated ring is unproven.

Established: photovoltaic generation, electric propulsion, computing, rectification and superconductivity. A superconductor has zero DC electrical resistance within its superconducting limits. Temperature, magnetic field, current and mechanical strain still constrain operation. [1] [2]

Demonstrated components: AALTO reports a 67-day solar Zephyr flight; NRL reports terrestrial microwave transfer of 1.6 kW over 1 km; flexible superconducting cable samples have been characterized. None demonstrates the proposed combined payload, flight formation or planet-scale suspended cryogenic cable. [3] [4] [13]

Proposed integration: distributed aircraft support and operate a power ring with AI loads and later ground export. All numbers below are calculated screening cases. The present reference case has a power deficit, and cable mass, current capacity and flight stability remain unclosed.

LSM connection: Earth-Data-Ring can support the wider research portfolio, but this model requires no unverified LSM energy source or material.

Deployment sequence

Five stages. One intended architecture.

01

Seed network

Independently flyable solar aircraft carry computing, communications, reserve energy, microwave transmitters and rectennas. Meter useful two-aircraft sharing and coordinated flight. Each island must survive its own night or use an explicitly metered external supply; a microwave link creates no energy.

02

Growing network

Add aircraft and solar area as manufacturing, funding, equipment supply and operations permit. Extend coverage and shorten gaps where useful. Compute actual hop losses and reserve requirements for every disconnected island.

03

Superconducting segments

Install flexible links only where mass, spacing and flight-control margins permit. Every segment includes supply and return conductors, conversion, cooling, mechanical support and section isolation. It is an electrically complete circuit before it encircles Earth. Microwave links bridge remaining gaps.

04

Complete ring

Join segments into a geographically continuous, flexible superconducting distribution network. Route illuminated-sector generation toward dark-side loads. Verify aggregate current, two-path operation, isolated-section recovery and whole-network stability.

05

Ground-delivery expansion

Use available microwave transmitters for ground rectennas, DC conditioning and ground loads or grid interfaces. Select mounting, steering range, polarization, frequency and receiver compatibility for both roles from the beginning; allocate shared transmitters and thermal capacity explicitly.

Incomplete network: a cabled segment, microwave gaps, isolated aircraft and a separate data layerIncomplete network · each aircraft retains reserve energy1234Paired cableMicrowaveMicrowaveSeparate data / flight-control layerLocal electrical circuits work before geographic closure
Incomplete network · schematic, not to scale. Paired conductors close local circuits; geographic ring closure is a later milestone. Data links do not imply power transfer.

Aircraft, links and ground receivers.

System interfaces
SubsystemRequired architecture
Aircraft nodePV and MPPT → local DC bus → propulsion, reserve storage, AI, communications, thermal auxiliaries and controllable power ports. Flight control has independent reserve power and load priority.
Microwave linkDC → RF source → steerable aperture → propagation/capture → rectenna → regulated DC. Compare solid-state and vacuum-electronic sources by efficiency, mass and steering; a maser is not mandatory.
Superconducting connectionSupply + return, insulated cryostat, structural tensile member, terminations, converter ports, refrigeration and sectionalizing. No Earth return or seawater return is assumed.
Network controlCurrent-limited converters regulate power sharing; dedicated data/control links coordinate formation, energy reserves and beam permission. Workload migration is optional and does not replace the power network.
Ground stationCompatible rectenna, beam-tracking telemetry, DC regulation, local loads and a separately approved grid interface. Reserve, cooling and aircraft demand take priority over export.

Geographic continuity does not require rigidity. Cable payout, tension control, sag, strain relief, distributed aerodynamic lift and relative aircraft motion need a coupled flexible-body flight model. Local independence and a planned disconnect/recovery mode are prerequisites for connecting aircraft.

Dual-role microwave transmitter: horizontal maintenance bridge or steered ground downlink to rectenna and grid interfaceABRetained microwave maintenance bridgeSteered downlinkSlant range, pointing, weatherGround rectennaDC → grid / loadReceiver telemetry / beam permit
Schematic, not to scale. Horizontal and downward beams illustrate alternative transmitter duties; simultaneous operation requires separate capacity. Ground-delivered power is net of all internal loads and downlink losses.

Transparent feasibility model

Size sunlight against every node.

Use SI units unless labeled otherwise. The 40,000 km circuit is an illustrative scale, not a selected route. The ρ = 0.20 kg/m³ atmospheric state is a calculation input, not an authorized altitude. Solve mass → lift/drag → power → cooling/storage → mass iteratively before selecting a design. Ranges below are independent probes, not a set of mutually feasible aircraft specifications.

Candidate inputs — assumptions, not measured ratings
QuantityReferenceSensitivity range
Route length L; spacing s40,000 km; 1 kmRoute by geography/authorization; s = 0.1–10 km
Equipped aircraft mass m₀; wing S1,000 kg; 200 m²m₀ = 500–2,000 kg; S = 100–400 m²
Solar area A; PV efficiency; derate180 m²; 30%; 0.90A = 90–360 m² (constrain A ≤ S); 22–35%; 0.75–0.95
Density; true airspeed; L/D; propulsion efficiency0.20 kg/m³; 30 m/s; 40; 0.75ρ = 0.09–0.74 kg/m³; 20–45 m/s; 25–60; 0.65–0.85
Daylight-sector mean plane-of-array irradiance G; lit fraction f700 W/m²; 0.50G = 400–900 W/m²; f = 0.40–0.60; calculate route/season/time jointly
AI; communication/control/pump auxiliaries5 kW; 1 kWAI = 0.5–20 kW; auxiliaries = 0.2–2 kW
Total paired cable assembly mass μ; equivalent diameter d0.05 kg/m; 0.015 mμ = 0.02–0.50 kg/m; d = 0.01–0.05 m; aspirational probes
Crossflow V⊥; cylinder drag coefficient10 m/s; 1.2V⊥ = 5–30 m/s; replace Cd with wind-tunnel data
Assembly cold heat leak q′; refrigerator COP0.10 W/m; 0.05q′ = 0.05–1 W/m; COP = 0.02–0.10
Interfaces; power-conversion loss allowance0.05 kW; 0.50 kW per node0.01–0.50 kW; 0.10–2 kW; replace with current-dependent maps
Line-to-line voltage; operating-current probe20 kV; 1 kA20–200 kV; 0.5–10 kA; jointly qualify insulation, cooling and mass

The 1,000 kg reference mass provisionally allocates 400 kg to structure/propulsion, 100 kg to PV, 100 kg to RF/data/compute, 200 kg to thermal equipment, cryocooler hardware, converters, support and contingency, and 200 kg to reserve batteries. These are mass allowances, not a bill of materials. Cable assembly mass is additional and includes both conductors, insulation, cryostat, coolant and structural support; no qualified product is claimed at 0.05 kg/m.

N = L/s; m = m₀ + μs; CL = mg/(½ρV²S)
Pflight = mgV/[(L/D)ηprop]
PPV,lit = A G ηPVdPV; PPV,total = N f PPV,lit

The reference has 40,000 aircraft and 1,050 kg per supported node, including 50 kg of allocated cable. Required CL = 0.572 and aircraft-only propulsion is 10.30 kW. At ρ = 0.09 kg/m³ the same load needs CL ≈ 1.27; measured stall margin and a drag polar determine whether that operating point works. S = 200 m² with aspect ratio 30 implies a 77 m span, an illustrative geometry with unresolved structural mass. [5] [6]

Fcable = ½ρV⊥² Cdds; Pcable ≈ FcableV⊥/ηprop
Qcold = q′ s; Prefrigerator = Qcold/COP

At 10 m/s transverse relative flow, a 1 km assembly gives 180 N of distributed drag and 2.40 kW of equivalent extra propulsion. This simplified crossflow work model excludes axial skin drag, fairings, lift devices and flutter; use force-vector work in the coupled flight solution. At 5 and 30 m/s, the same model gives 0.30 and 64.80 kW. Alignment matters as much as spacing.

Reference balance — allocated per node
TermCalculated power
PV per illuminated aircraft34.02 kW
PV averaged over all aircraft17.01 kW
Aircraft propulsion10.30 kW
Cable aerodynamic work2.40 kW
AI computing + other auxiliaries5.00 + 1.00 kW
Refrigeration2.00 kW
Joints/interfaces + conversion allowances0.05 + 0.50 kW
Total internal demand21.25 kW
Generation minus demand-4.24 kW (deficit)

Pmargin = N[fPPV,lit − Pinternal,node] − Pgap losses − Preserve recharge
Pground = ηdownlink × max(0, Pmargin), capped by transmitter and receiver availability

Reference result: 680.4 MW solar versus 850.0 MW internal demand: a 169.6 MW deficit and 0 MW ground export. This is a lower-bound internal budget: the reference assigns zero gap transfer and zero reserve recharge, and those terms must be added for the actual operating schedule. The existing battery mass remains carried. Never interpret max(0, margin) as a way to hide an internal deficit.

One-variable sensitivity — all other reference inputs held fixed
ChangeInternal / solar kW per nodeConditional network export
Reference21.25 / 17.010 MW
AI reduced to 0.5 kW16.75 / 17.015.38 MW before omitted margins
Daylight mean G = 400 W/m²21.25 / 9.720 MW
Daylight mean G = 900 W/m²21.25 / 21.8712.85 MW before omitted margins
Cable crossflow = 30 m/s83.65 / 17.010 MW

Positive arithmetic cases are not feasible designs: mass, current capacity, local voltage, pointing, weather and reserve closure remain gates. Reference break-even solar area is about 225 m², exceeding the assumed 200 m² wing. Enlarging the wing or adding lifting collectors requires another mass/drag iteration. Some aircraft being illuminated does not establish continuous export; use the minimum time-resolved margin over the authorized route and season.

Where the design must close.

Nighttime reserves and aircraft mass

For an isolated seed aircraft at 1,000 kg with no cable/refrigeration/link-converter load, propulsion is 9.81 kW. With 5 kW computing and 1 kW auxiliaries, night demand is 15.81 kW. A 12 h night requires 189.72 kWh delivered. At an assumed 80% usable depth and 95% discharge efficiency, nameplate storage is 249.63 kWh; a 300 Wh/kg pack would weigh 832 kg. Pack specific energy is a design input, not a cell-level claim.

mbattery = tnightPnight /(DoD × ηdischarge × epack)

The allocated 200 kg pack supplies only 45.6 kWh, or 2.88 h at this demand. Substituting the larger battery raises propulsion. Keeping the non-battery mass at 800 kg and L/D fixed, solving m = 800 + 12(0.00981m + 6)/(0.8 × 0.95 × 0.30) gives about 2,307 kg, including 1,507 kg of batteries. This already violates the original mass case and requires about 687 kWh/day before charging losses, versus 408 kWh/day from the reference 12 h solar profile. It fails continuous isolated operation.

Sweep night duration 10–16 h, pack energy 200–400 Wh/kg, useful depth 0.7–0.9 and discharge efficiency 0.90–0.98. At fixed 15.81 kW, battery mass spans roughly 448–2,008 kg before iteration. Recharging also costs energy (e.g. divide delivered night energy by 0.95 × 0.95 for an assumed charge/discharge pair). Evaluate verified lower-power flight modes, load shedding, scheduled landing, larger collection area or explicitly external power. The complete ring can reduce routine overnight storage but still needs fault and recovery reserves.

Microwave aperture, spacing, pointing and hop losses

For a uniformly illuminated circular aperture, a far-field diffraction screen is θ ≈ 1.22λ/D to the first null, with spot radius r ≈ θR. At 10 GHz (λ ≈ 0.030 m), D = 3 m and R = 1 km give θ ≈ 12.2 mrad and r ≈ 12.2 m; the far-field boundary 2D²/λ ≈ 600 m is satisfied. A receiver reaching the first null would be about 24.4 m wide, incompatible with treating it as a small accessory. The first-null radius is not 100% capture.

Across f = 5.8–10 GHz, D = 1–5 m and R = 0.1–10 km, solve Fresnel propagation when R is not well beyond 2D²/λ. Do not use a far-field link formula that predicts capture above unity. Aperture area, taper, polarization, atmospheric loss, beam jitter and spillover set the measured capture fraction. A 1 mrad pointing error shifts the beam 1 m at 1 km and 20 m at 20 km. An initial test target is ≤1 mrad RMS; receiver dimensions and measured spillover must determine the actual limit.

ηhop = ηDC→RF × ηpropagation/capture × ηRF→DC × ηregulator
Preceived = Psent × ∏ηhop,i

An explicitly assumed link uses 0.80 × 0.80 × 0.90 × 0.95 = 0.5472. Ten, fifty and one hundred identical hops retain only 0.241%, about 8.1 × 10⁻¹²%, and about 6.5 × 10⁻²⁵%, respectively, before intermediate aircraft consume energy. Sweep the four factors over 0.60–0.85, 0.10–0.90, 0.65–0.90 and 0.90–0.98: one-hop efficiency spans about 3.5–67.5%. These independent ranges do not imply any selected combination is achievable. Microwave links suit measured local transfers and gaps; they cannot silently carry half a planet’s power through lossless relays. [3] [12]

For ground delivery, a hypothetical 20 km slant range with the same 3 m, 10 GHz aperture gives a first-null radius near 244 m. The example downlink factor 0.80 × 0.80 × 0.90 × 0.90 = 0.5184 includes DC–RF, path/capture, rectification and final conversion. It is not inferred from the small interaircraft receiver. Compute elevation, steering limits, ground footprint, rain loss, sidelobes and receiver area for each ground site. At 10 kW RF output and 80% source efficiency, the transmitter alone must reject 2.5 kW of heat.

Flexible cable, cryogenics and aggregate current

For s = 1 km and μ = 0.05 kg/m, each assembly weighs 50 kg; a 40,000 km loop weighs 2,000 tonnes before additional distributed supports. Under a small-sag static approximation, horizontal tension H ≈ ws²/(8δ), w = μg. A 50 m sag gives H ≈ 1.23 kN from self-weight, before transverse drag, gusts and aircraft motion. At 10 km spacing, the same sag gives about 123 kN. Sag, curvature and allowable bend strain must be solved together. Distributed lifting surfaces may reduce endpoint loads but add mass, drag and controls.

A continuously moving ring cannot be treated as a set of independent aircraft tracks. Model wind shear, jet streams, route curvature, formation errors, cable oscillation, thermal contraction, icing at relevant altitudes, lightning, failure propagation and takeoff/landing/replacement. Validate tension, strain and control margins with flexible multibody dynamics and gust spectra.

The cold heat leak is 100 W per km in the reference, giving 2 kW of refrigerator input per node and 80 MW across the loop. For a 77 K cold stage rejecting to 300 K, ideal Carnot COP is 77/(300 − 77) ≈ 0.345; the assumed actual COP 0.05 is below that bound but still requires hardware evidence. Across q′ and COP ranges, refrigeration is 0.5–50 kW per 1 km assembly. Cooling hardware mass, coolant inventory, startup cooldown, vacuum maintenance and local failure recovery remain design constraints. [1] [2]

Zero conductor DC resistance does not eliminate refrigeration, resistive joints/interfaces, current-lead heat, converter loss or time-varying magnetic/AC losses. Separately meter these terms; cold joint heat adds to refrigerator load. Replace the small interface allowance with I²Rjoint, current-lead heat and ripple-loss maps at actual through-current.

P = Vline-to-lineI; Ioperating < Ic(T, B, strain), with declared margin

If a contiguous dark half consumes the reference 21.25 kW per node, each of two symmetric terminator feeds must carry about 212.5 MW before distribution losses. At 20 kV, that is 10,625 A per path. The illustrative 1 kA circuit carries only 20 MW and fails that aggregate demand. After loss of one path, the surviving route may face twice the transfer. At 200 kV the normal two-path current would still be about 1,063 A. Higher voltage, current capacity, insulation and superconductivity are separate choices; none is free in the mass budget.

Inductance, not DC resistance, limits current change. Test converter droop, current sharing, distributed modes, protection selectivity, stored magnetic energy (½LI²), quench detection, energy dumps and reclosure. Section isolation permits rerouting only if the remaining path and converters have capacity. Microwave bridges also need independently sufficient power and energy margins; they do not guarantee full service after a cut.

Thermal rejection and real route conditions

AI electricity becomes heat. Count AI, communication/control, converter and RF losses, warm interfaces, and refrigerator hot-side rejection Qhot = Qcold + Prefrigerator. The reference subtotal is 5 + 1 + 0.50 + 0.05 + 2.10 = 8.65 kW per node, before motor losses, absorbed sunlight and any active microwave source. It is a thermal subtotal, not extra electrical demand to add again.

Qnet = Arad[εσ(Trad⁴ − Teffective⁴) + h(Trad − Tair)] − Qabsorbed

At ε = 0.9, Trad = 320 K and effective radiative surroundings at 250 K, the radiative-only net flux is about 336 W/m²: 8.65 kW requires about 25.8 m² of emitting surface. This is an ideal screen with no absorbed sunlight and no convection credit. At 300–350 K with the same surroundings, it becomes roughly 40.4–15.3 m². Include Earth/sky view factors, solar absorption, air temperature, airspeed-dependent convection, pressure drop, heat exchanger mass and drag. Space-radiator performance cannot be copied directly into an atmospheric design. [7]

Calculate plane-of-array irradiance through the whole day, cloud/weather statistics, latitude, season, bank angle, shading and outages. True airspeed determines lift; winds determine ground track and crossflow. Altitude changes density, weather, solar input, cooling and approved operations. No universal permitted altitude is assumed. Connect the energy ledger to Earth Radiator; solar electricity reallocates incoming sunlight and must not be counted as newly created energy.

An authorized operating envelope.

The US screening aircraft is far above the small-UAS mass category. FAA guidance identifies airworthiness/certification or applicable exemption pathways, Part 91 operating requirements and airspace authorization for large UAS. Define the particular aircraft, pilot/operator arrangements, beyond-visual-line-of-sight operation, detect-and-avoid, formation/tether configuration, route, altitude, launch/recovery and lost-link behavior with the responsible authority. A high-altitude concept has no automatic airspace exemption. [8]

International pilotless flight needs the relevant states’ authorizations under the Chicago Convention framework; a continuous cable crossing jurisdictions adds issues requiring specific assessment. Radio arrangements likewise need appropriate national equipment, spectrum and operating authorization, interference coordination and applicable RF exposure compliance. Consult FCC experimental licensing for US tests and the current ITU RF-beam WPT report for technical context. An ISM band label is not permission to operate an arbitrary high-power airborne beam. Ground receiver siting and grid interconnection are additional local requirements. No approval is represented as obtained. [9] [10] [11] [12]

Proposed milestones · no completed tests claimed

Earn each increase in scale.

01

Ground power-transfer tests

Start at a declared, authorized 10–100 m range and 100 W–1 kW delivered-DC target. Meter source DC, radiated/captured RF, rectified DC and heat.

Advance when: Close the energy ledger within a predeclared ±5% measurement uncertainty; map pointing, spillover, conversion and automatic beam inhibition over 100 tracking/loss events.

02

Two-aircraft transfer

Fly independently first, then measure a declared 100–500 m separation envelope with reserve energy and flight priority.

Advance when: Sustain a nominated 100 W useful receiving-bus load for 30 min; log both aircraft’s net energy, RMS pointing and reserve state, including ten commanded transfer interruptions. These are test targets, not licensed parameters.

03

Short superconducting connection

Qualify a 10–30 m paired cable on the ground before flight: weigh the complete assembly and measure heat leak, COP, critical-current margin, tension and bend life.

Advance when: Operate a selected 100 A test point at ≤50% of measured critical current for the worst tested T/B/strain; record 1,000 bend cycles and ten controlled isolation/quench-response trials without exceeding declared thermal/mechanical limits.

04

Multi-aircraft connected segment

Use 3–5 aircraft at a spacing earned by the preceding tests; independently close the circuit and validate flexible-cable flight control.

Advance when: Complete a 24 h energy-balanced trial with declared reserves; remain within measured tension/strain margins and recover from loss of one converter and one data link.

05

Join two segments

Synchronize converter controls, join and isolate sections, and exercise the microwave gap bridge and shared downlink hardware.

Advance when: Meter 20 planned connect/isolate cycles; keep bus transients within ±10% of the nominated voltage and all currents below qualified limits. Publish recovery time and bridge capacity.

06

Eventual ring closure and export

Only after seasonal route simulation, authorized multi-state operations, converged mass/power/current budgets and independently reviewed flight stability.

Advance when: Demonstrate a 30-day reference mission with positive minimum reserve margin and a tested isolated-section case; verify seasonal robustness before a continuous-service claim. Meter net ground electricity for 24 h before claiming continuous export at that rating.

These acceptance targets are starting research specifications and may be tightened by the test design or authorities. There is no scheduled ring completion, committed funding or justified capital-cost estimate. The next deliverable is a weighed component ledger and a metered ground-link dataset, followed by a coupled mass–power–thermal iteration that publishes both successful and failed cases.

Primary sources and provenance.

Source review: 3 October 2026. Historical demonstrations are dated above; current agency guidance and the June 2026 ITU report inform the operating study. Equations and numerical scenarios are this proposal’s calculations, not quoted product performance.

  1. DOE — Superconductivity

    Zero DC resistance and critical-current limits; established physics.

  2. NIST — Critical Current Metrology (updated 2025)

    Temperature, magnetic field and strain dependence; no airborne cable rating inferred.

  3. NRL — SCOPE-M terrestrial demonstration (2022)

    NRL reports 1.6 kW over 1 km. A ground demonstration, not aircraft-to-aircraft evidence or the efficiency assumed here.

  4. AALTO — Zephyr 67-day flight (2025)

    Manufacturer-reported solar flight with connectivity testing; flight terminated over a designated ocean area. Not validation of this payload or cable architecture.

  5. NASA Glenn — Lift equation

    The lift accounting used in the screening model.

  6. NASA Glenn — Drag equation

    Drag coefficients require configuration-specific evidence.

  7. NASA — Thermal control

    Radiation, surface properties and environmental heat loads; airborne convection must be evaluated separately.

  8. FAA — Large UAS, ENR 8.3

    US airworthiness, operational authorization and airspace context for aircraft of 55 lb or more.

  9. ICAO — Development of UAS regulation

    Article 8 and state-specific authorization; operational risk includes altitude, airspace and populated areas.

  10. FCC — Wireless Power Transfer, KDB 680106

    Equipment authorization and RF exposure guidance; no blanket permission for the proposed high-power beams.

  11. FCC — Experimental license types

    A route for requesting experimental radio authorization; does not grant an operating frequency or power.

  12. ITU-R SM.2392-2 (June 2026)

    Current report on applications of RF-beam wireless power transmission, not a spectrum license.

  13. NIST — Flexible REBCO CORC cable characterization

    Measured superconducting cable component research; not a demonstrated lightweight airborne cryogenic assembly.

Visitor feedback

Comments or suggestions?

Share your thoughts on Earth-Data-Ring. Your message goes to the site owner’s private inbox.

Send visitor feedback